<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Flickr Stats Mean for You</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.photopreneur.com/what-flickr-stats-mean-for-you/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.photopreneur.com/what-flickr-stats-mean-for-you</link>
	<description>Marketing Your Photography Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:28:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alfie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.photopreneur.com/what-flickr-stats-mean-for-you/comment-page-1#comment-3920</link>
		<dc:creator>Alfie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.photopreneur.com/what-flickr-stats-mean-for-you#comment-3920</guid>
		<description>Hi, Ive been using flickr religiously for a year now and have been aware of how the site generally works. Now this problem appeared in our group which created sabotages and rebellions amongst members with attitude. At the groups flickriver, I was surprised seeing two photos that are really ordinary and not interesting. It is obvious that there are shenanigans behind the 19000+ views on that single photo; because I am sure that there is no way that that photo could reach that amount of views in a small amount of time. What could be the explanation behind this? Was that caused by a program or was that a result of hacking or what?? Please help me. I want to resolve this issue. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Ive been using flickr religiously for a year now and have been aware of how the site generally works. Now this problem appeared in our group which created sabotages and rebellions amongst members with attitude. At the groups flickriver, I was surprised seeing two photos that are really ordinary and not interesting. It is obvious that there are shenanigans behind the 19000+ views on that single photo; because I am sure that there is no way that that photo could reach that amount of views in a small amount of time. What could be the explanation behind this? Was that caused by a program or was that a result of hacking or what?? Please help me. I want to resolve this issue. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joao Paglione</title>
		<link>http://blogs.photopreneur.com/what-flickr-stats-mean-for-you/comment-page-1#comment-881</link>
		<dc:creator>Joao Paglione</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 13:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.photopreneur.com/what-flickr-stats-mean-for-you#comment-881</guid>
		<description>I just linked to your blog on a photo I recently sold to a repeat customer. Not only did he find my first photo on a keyword search but the second one as well.

I sold it for a good price.

However, he wanted the photo in it´s original color. I had over 100,000 photos from 2005 in Brazil unorganized so it took me almost an hour to find it.

Good tip for beginning photographers, use a good system to tag and organize all your photos! 

If you are PRO, keep the highest copy online just for you...

Thanks for maintaining this blog!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just linked to your blog on a photo I recently sold to a repeat customer. Not only did he find my first photo on a keyword search but the second one as well.</p>
<p>I sold it for a good price.</p>
<p>However, he wanted the photo in it´s original color. I had over 100,000 photos from 2005 in Brazil unorganized so it took me almost an hour to find it.</p>
<p>Good tip for beginning photographers, use a good system to tag and organize all your photos! </p>
<p>If you are PRO, keep the highest copy online just for you...</p>
<p>Thanks for maintaining this blog!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

