Promote JPG Magazine and Market your Images


jpgmag.jpg


There are two kinds of photo competitions. There are contests like The Pilsner Urquell International Photography Awards Competition, judged by experts and offering large cash prizes and heaps of recognition, even to amateurs. And there are ‘contests’ like the awards doled out liberally by members of Flickr. Although the prize is rarely more than a graphic image on a list of comments, it’s always nice to be admired by your peers rather than be scrutinized by a professional critic.

And then there’s JPG Magazine, which combines both online peer review and editorial judging to choose the best images for inclusion in its print magazine. Published photographers receive a fee of $100, a free copy of the magazine, and the kind of bragging rights that can only come from seeing your photo on a glossy magazine page.

Anyone can join JPG Magazine’s website and submit images online, but submissions must match one of the themes selected by the magazine’s editors who stress that they only want your best shots, not every photo that fits. Other members then vote on the images that they believe should be published. Votes are averaged out by the day, so early submissions only have the advantage of being known for a longer period of time rather than the opportunity of building a larger vote total.

Images that win the most votes though, don’t necessarily make the cut. In an interview with VentureBeat, JPG’s editor, Paul Cloutier, explained that one reason for not relying entirely on user opinion is that it can cause a site to become homogenous, like Digg and some other social networking tools. The website itself offers a more practical reason. It notes that the magazine receives far too many images for the editors to check, so the voting is simply an important way to sort the photos for editorial review, not a way of choosing images for publication. The magazine’s staff still make the final decision.

In fact, a spokesperson for the site told us,

[t]he website currently receives over 7 million visits per month and over a thousand new photos are uploaded every day. Our upcoming issue, issue 14, will feature the themes Fanatic, Emotion Capture, and Bird’s-eye View and received 10,993 submissions.

That amounts to around one submission for every ten of the site’s 110,000 members. These, we were told, consist of

the “in between” of amateur and professional. They may not be interested in the $1,000 lenses but carry their favorite camera wherever they go. They learn and explore the techniques they love, and leave the rest. There are photography students, wedding photographers that use JPG to share and develop their non-commercial work, photographers that build pin-hole cameras, and digital junkies as well.

With such a broad spread, it’s not surprising that a glance at the images submitted to one of the magazine’s themes and arranged by “newness” shows quality that ranges from the beautiful to the bland. It’s also possible though to browse submitted images by “hotness,” a collection of higher quality photos chosen according to a secret formula and which are likely to receive greater attention and more votes. (We asked how the magazine awards “hotness” but were only referred to the page that explains the voting process.) In addition to retaining the right to discount winning votes then, the editors also show that they also favor certain candidates during the competition.

On a regular photography site, this editorial power might irritate, but JPG Magazine isn’t a regular photography site. Although each edition is available for free download, the site is intended to be seen in print format:

We believe that no matter how beautiful photographs can look on a monitor, it’s just not possible to beat the experience of a print photo magazine.

Because it costs a great deal more money to create a print publication than a website, that does create a higher level of risk for the magazine’s publishers, 80/20 Media. (The numbers refer to 80 percent user contribution and 20 percent editorial control). With money at stake, it’s understandable then that the publishers will want to increase the chances that the magazine has images powerful enough to sell.

Paul Cloutier, however, has noted that the magazine only needs sales of 25,000 to break even and does recoup the cost of printing. He also pointed out that the site couldn’t exist without the print version.

Part of the reason for that might be the networking power that comes with an open voting system — even if it’s a system that’s not entirely democratic. Aside from shooting high quality photos that match the theme, the only strategy that a photographer can use to win votes is to spread the word among friends and ask for them to vote their photo up. By promoting their images, photographers also provide the magazine with free marketing.

Of course, that also means that if you win and get published, more people will know about it.

[tags] community photography marketing, jpg magazine [/tags]


7 comments for this post.

  1. linkerjpatrick Said:

    Thanks for the heads up on this. I definitely plan on submitting some stuff. Also my full name initials are J.P.G. I always get a kick out of that since photography is one of my big passions.

  2. Nick Charlton Said:

    Thanks for the article. This one has really stood out for me as it feels like something I can do myself. May I request more tips like this?

    Thanks,

    Nick

  3. Aaron Lindberg Said:

    I love JPG. I need to post more of my work on this site. If anyone joins and wants to link up add me here.

    http://www.jpgmag.com/people/aaronlindberg

    Rock on JPG MAG!!!

  4. Jon Said:

    I've been a JPG member for several months. The editors put together a fantastic product. In fact, I bought my first JPG magazine before I was even aware of the online community.

    Unfortunately, there are some big drawbacks to their skyrocketing popularity and to the user submission model in general. First, everyone and their mother is a digital photographer now. Be prepared to sift through lots of crap to find a gem. I certainly don't envy the editors in this regard. The "hotness" algorithm certainly helps, but doesn't seem to be the perfect solution. Second, the majority of users submit material that is clearly not applicable to the categories. It's maddening. It makes the voting process almost intolerable.

    That said, the magazine is amazing. There are some truly great photographers in the community that rise above the rest.

  5. blaneyphoto Said:

    Before diving in head first into JPG, it might be worthwhile taking some time to read up on Pauls treatment of JPG's true founders, Heather Champ and DerekPowazek. Not someone I'd ever encourage people to be involved with, no matter how "cool" the mag is.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JPG_(magazine)
    http://www.powazek.com/posts/534

  6. Jon Said:

    Re:blaneyphoto's post

    Yeah, they definitely got a raw deal as far as working for 8020 went. Still, the original founders had a stake in JPG magazine and walked away with money in their pocket. While I'm sure much of the Powazeks' bitterness is justified, it was Paul's connection that lead them to 8020's financial backer and they all went into the deal with their eyes open. There are always two sides to every argument.

  7. eloycm Said:

    So, in order to get published, do you have to be social? is jpg magazing a social network? it is possible to get published without been social?, i.e. without "contacts" and without commenting other people pictures? I mean is it flickr 2 or something different. I don't get it yet. In flickr many bad photographers get explored constantly because they are socially active, on the other hand it's impossible to get explored in flickr without been social.... it's this the case with jpg?.

Click on a tab to select how you'd like to leave your comment

Leave a Comment



Copyright ©2014 New Media Entertainment, Ltd. v2