<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Professional Photographers Turn to Microstock</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.photopreneur.com/professional-photographers-turn-to-microstock/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.photopreneur.com/professional-photographers-turn-to-microstock</link>
	<description>Marketing Your Photography Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:53:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Debenport</title>
		<link>http://blogs.photopreneur.com/professional-photographers-turn-to-microstock/comment-page-1#comment-3641</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Debenport</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 04:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.photopreneur.com/?p=938#comment-3641</guid>
		<description>Good article. It&#039;s hard to tell what the stock world will look like in a few years, but I do think RM will not go away. It may be reduced more, but I think there will always be a need for exclusive photo licenses. By the way, I could see an future article entitled &quot;Microstock Photographers turn Professional.&quot; ( word-play on this title :) )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article. It's hard to tell what the stock world will look like in a few years, but I do think RM will not go away. It may be reduced more, but I think there will always be a need for exclusive photo licenses. By the way, I could see an future article entitled "Microstock Photographers turn Professional." ( word-play on this title <img src='http://blogs.photopreneur.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: microstockphoto</title>
		<link>http://blogs.photopreneur.com/professional-photographers-turn-to-microstock/comment-page-1#comment-2708</link>
		<dc:creator>microstockphoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 22:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.photopreneur.com/?p=938#comment-2708</guid>
		<description>Nice article. Glad to see that professional photographers are ready to experiment with new ways of selling pictures: professionalism is in making photos - and no doubt yours are great - regardless of how they are being sold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article. Glad to see that professional photographers are ready to experiment with new ways of selling pictures: professionalism is in making photos - and no doubt yours are great - regardless of how they are being sold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cherry</title>
		<link>http://blogs.photopreneur.com/professional-photographers-turn-to-microstock/comment-page-1#comment-2595</link>
		<dc:creator>Cherry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 12:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.photopreneur.com/?p=938#comment-2595</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this post, it made me rethink some strategies. I suppose the combination of micro stock and traditional stock could be the best bet these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this post, it made me rethink some strategies. I suppose the combination of micro stock and traditional stock could be the best bet these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lolo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.photopreneur.com/professional-photographers-turn-to-microstock/comment-page-1#comment-2533</link>
		<dc:creator>lolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.photopreneur.com/?p=938#comment-2533</guid>
		<description>Interesting article. Moving of photographers the other way also exist i.e microstock photographers who as they develop their skills and porfolio start sending their pictures to RM agencies.
You are mentioning Shutterstock’s 144,000 contributors but I bet they are a lot less than that if you consider the ones who gave up on submitting and the ones who never get accepted as contributors but who are registered initially....
L</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article. Moving of photographers the other way also exist i.e microstock photographers who as they develop their skills and porfolio start sending their pictures to RM agencies.<br />
You are mentioning Shutterstock’s 144,000 contributors but I bet they are a lot less than that if you consider the ones who gave up on submitting and the ones who never get accepted as contributors but who are registered initially....<br />
L</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

