<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pixish Lets Photographers Help Buyers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.photopreneur.com/pixish-lets-photographers-help-buyers/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.photopreneur.com/pixish-lets-photographers-help-buyers</link>
	<description>Marketing Your Photography Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:02:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://blogs.photopreneur.com/pixish-lets-photographers-help-buyers/comment-page-1#comment-1193</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 19:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.photopreneur.com/pixish-lets-photographers-help-buyers#comment-1193</guid>
		<description>Agree with all the rest.. I&#039;d hate to be a professional photographer that doesn&#039;t rely on weddings to make their living... seems like every day a new Stock Agency opens up on the web offering photos for .20 or so... and now this.. let&#039;s just give it all away!

Sorry.. but as digital cameras get better and better and cheaper and cheaper... the market for a pro photographer will get smaller and smaller.. except for weddings..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with all the rest.. I'd hate to be a professional photographer that doesn't rely on weddings to make their living... seems like every day a new Stock Agency opens up on the web offering photos for .20 or so... and now this.. let's just give it all away!</p>
<p>Sorry.. but as digital cameras get better and better and cheaper and cheaper... the market for a pro photographer will get smaller and smaller.. except for weddings..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd G</title>
		<link>http://blogs.photopreneur.com/pixish-lets-photographers-help-buyers/comment-page-1#comment-1117</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 23:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.photopreneur.com/pixish-lets-photographers-help-buyers#comment-1117</guid>
		<description>Sorry, Derek, but I agree with the other posters. It sounded interesting so I went and registered, but when I looked at the requests I doubt I&#039;ll go back. I looked through a half-dozen or so, and didn&#039;t see any real compensation:

&quot;Appear in a slideshow!&quot;
&quot;Get a T-shirt&quot;
&quot;Appear on my web site&quot;
&quot;Be satisfied that you&#039;re supporting Obama&quot;

and my favorites, 

&quot;The winner will get a hearty pat on the back&quot; and 
&quot;The prize is priceless: My love and admiration.&quot;

As my daughter says, &quot;OoooooooKaaaaaaay...&quot;

Sorry, but I&#039;d would have gotten some real buyers before wasting a promo splash.

Good luck, tho!

(I just went back and see there are a couple of paying jobs now, but I&#039;d suggest some minimum value criteria for gigs. Again, good luck with it.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, Derek, but I agree with the other posters. It sounded interesting so I went and registered, but when I looked at the requests I doubt I'll go back. I looked through a half-dozen or so, and didn't see any real compensation:</p>
<p>"Appear in a slideshow!"<br />
"Get a T-shirt"<br />
"Appear on my web site"<br />
"Be satisfied that you're supporting Obama"</p>
<p>and my favorites, </p>
<p>"The winner will get a hearty pat on the back" and<br />
"The prize is priceless: My love and admiration."</p>
<p>As my daughter says, "OoooooooKaaaaaaay..."</p>
<p>Sorry, but I'd would have gotten some real buyers before wasting a promo splash.</p>
<p>Good luck, tho!</p>
<p>(I just went back and see there are a couple of paying jobs now, but I'd suggest some minimum value criteria for gigs. Again, good luck with it.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://blogs.photopreneur.com/pixish-lets-photographers-help-buyers/comment-page-1#comment-1086</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.photopreneur.com/pixish-lets-photographers-help-buyers#comment-1086</guid>
		<description>Hi there! I&#039;m Derek from Pixish. I just wanted to say that the concern over spec work is understood on our end and we&#039;re going to be making some changes to the site to make it more clear that it&#039;s not what the site is about. Remember, we&#039;re still in beta. We released it early to gather feedback, so thanks for that!

Here&#039;s more thinking on the subject: http://pixish.com/news/3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there! I'm Derek from Pixish. I just wanted to say that the concern over spec work is understood on our end and we're going to be making some changes to the site to make it more clear that it's not what the site is about. Remember, we're still in beta. We released it early to gather feedback, so thanks for that!</p>
<p>Here's more thinking on the subject: <a href="http://pixish.com/news/3"   rel="nofollow">http://pixish.com/news/3</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John F.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.photopreneur.com/pixish-lets-photographers-help-buyers/comment-page-1#comment-1085</link>
		<dc:creator>John F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.photopreneur.com/pixish-lets-photographers-help-buyers#comment-1085</guid>
		<description>Hi,

John Harrington posted something about this worth reading over here:
http://photobusinessforum.blogspot.com/2008/02/pixish-stupid-is-as-stupid-does.html

I for one am against this type of crowd sourcing contest nonsense out of sheer principle. However, I can&#039;t help but think that any decent pro out there is NOT going to devalue themselves by submitting work in exchange for a &quot;pat on the back&quot; when that can be easily had for free on Flickr or through charity work. I for one, would not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>John Harrington posted something about this worth reading over here:<br />
<a href="http://photobusinessforum.blogspot.com/2008/02/pixish-stupid-is-as-stupid-does.html"   rel="nofollow">http://photobusinessforum.blogspot.com/2008/02/pixish-stupid-is-as-stupid-does.html</a></p>
<p>I for one am against this type of crowd sourcing contest nonsense out of sheer principle. However, I can't help but think that any decent pro out there is NOT going to devalue themselves by submitting work in exchange for a "pat on the back" when that can be easily had for free on Flickr or through charity work. I for one, would not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Bannister</title>
		<link>http://blogs.photopreneur.com/pixish-lets-photographers-help-buyers/comment-page-1#comment-1083</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Bannister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.photopreneur.com/pixish-lets-photographers-help-buyers#comment-1083</guid>
		<description>&quot;For now then, the biggest benefit that Pixish offers photographers might be the chance to get images off the hard drive, and into use — and to get known in the process.&quot;

I don&#039;t get it. Why the driving urge to give away images in exchange for embarrassing and worthless tat just to &quot;get them off the hard drive and into use&quot;? This is the equivalent of getting free labour from high school kids by offering them &quot;experience&quot; instead of pay for their hard work.

The recipients of these images are profiting from you and your work and this system just says to me, &quot;you&#039;re a stupid sucker and your work is worthless but, I&#039;ll give you a used CD for it cause ya need the help&quot; If you support this, you cheapen the profession, devalue your work and encourage others to take advantage of people. 

How come nobody ever tries this with a cab driver, plumber or a lawyer? Because they know their worth and take pride in their work, you should too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"For now then, the biggest benefit that Pixish offers photographers might be the chance to get images off the hard drive, and into use — and to get known in the process."</p>
<p>I don't get it. Why the driving urge to give away images in exchange for embarrassing and worthless tat just to "get them off the hard drive and into use"? This is the equivalent of getting free labour from high school kids by offering them "experience" instead of pay for their hard work.</p>
<p>The recipients of these images are profiting from you and your work and this system just says to me, "you're a stupid sucker and your work is worthless but, I'll give you a used CD for it cause ya need the help" If you support this, you cheapen the profession, devalue your work and encourage others to take advantage of people. </p>
<p>How come nobody ever tries this with a cab driver, plumber or a lawyer? Because they know their worth and take pride in their work, you should too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.photopreneur.com/pixish-lets-photographers-help-buyers/comment-page-1#comment-1077</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 01:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.photopreneur.com/pixish-lets-photographers-help-buyers#comment-1077</guid>
		<description>Not to be a party bummer, but doesn&#039;t this sound a lot like working on SPEC? The advertiser, instead of hiring a photographer to do the job, will post a request on pixish, and get a lot of replies. Then they can safely choose a photograph they want and pay very little for it. Wouldn&#039;t that hurt the same photographers who are trying to go into business, not mentioning the ones already in business? The whole &#039;community&#039; concept seems like a cover up for another spec website. As for comparison to JPG magazine: JPG asks for photos for the sake of printing their own magazine, not for some random companies wanting the photos. Yes they do make money off the photographers that submit photos to them, and only a few that get published are actually paid, but at least it’s not straight out &#039;work on assignment&#039; thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to be a party bummer, but doesn't this sound a lot like working on SPEC? The advertiser, instead of hiring a photographer to do the job, will post a request on pixish, and get a lot of replies. Then they can safely choose a photograph they want and pay very little for it. Wouldn't that hurt the same photographers who are trying to go into business, not mentioning the ones already in business? The whole 'community' concept seems like a cover up for another spec website. As for comparison to JPG magazine: JPG asks for photos for the sake of printing their own magazine, not for some random companies wanting the photos. Yes they do make money off the photographers that submit photos to them, and only a few that get published are actually paid, but at least it’s not straight out 'work on assignment' thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
